Join our team

We look forward to receiving your information and cv regarding a role with InterMedia

Upload your CV

Contact us

Unit 6 The Enterprise Centre
Kelvin Lane, Crawley,
RH10 9PE

20th April 2017

Vanity Fair to introduce digital paywall

Title is reportedly setting metered charges for its content.

The magazine that President Trump called “dead” is trying something new. Vanity Fair is planning to roll out a digital paywall, Yahoo Finance has learned.

Vanity Fair editor-in-chief Graydon Carter wants the new paywall ready in the next two to six months, according to communication seen by Yahoo Finance. Years ago, the magazine very rarely made select print features subscriber-only (like a 2014 cover investigation on Edward Snowden) but it did not have any formal, metered paywall.

The new move comes after the Conde Nast title saw its web traffic and digital revenue go up recently. Adweek reported that’s 14 million monthly unique visitors last October was up 27% over a year before. And its digital revenue was up 74% year over year.

Perhaps that’s why Carter believes now is the time for a paywall. So, will online readers pay up? (Conde Nast did not provide a comment for this story.)

In December, after the magazine published a scathing restaurant review of Trump Grill in Manhattan’s Trump Tower, Trump tweeted that Vanity Fair was “way down” and in “big trouble.” But that day, Vanity Fair sold 100 times more new subscriptions than it usually sells in a day, and quickly gained 10,000 new Twitter followers.

Vanity Fair is now using the tagline, “The magazine Trump doesn’t want you to read” in its subscription advertisements. On Wednesday, the web site published “The optimist’s guide to impeaching Donald Trump.”

Many print newspapers have experimented with paywalls online, with varying levels of success and varying degrees of “porousness.” (Some of them can be evaded simply by turning off your ad-blocker or switching your browser to incognito mode.) The New York Times, Wall Street Journal (NewsCorp-owned), Washington Post, Chicago Tribune (Tronc), and Boston Globe, to name a few, all have a “metered” approach, meaning they allow you a certain number (typically 10-20) of free articles per month before you must log in and pay. Business Insider has also been testing out a partial paywall. The Financial Times switched its metered model to a “hard” paywall in 2015.

In England, the Daily Telegraph and Sunday Telegraph recently introduced a paywall with a twist: only the “most unique, in-depth and insightful journalism” is behind the wall, which amounts to 15% of its articles.

As of one year ago, according to a report at the time from the American Press Institute, 79% of US newspapers with circulation over 50,000 had implemented some sort of paywall. The average weekly price of subscription: $3.11.

In magazines, The Nation launched a metered paywall last year, while Newsweek went the other way, dropping its paywall. At Time Inc, different magazine brands have taken different strategies: still has a paywall in place for many of its archived stories, while, which briefly tested a paywall for some print features a few years ago, quietly stopped.

The New Yorker is often cited as a paywall success story. It implemented a metered paywall in 2014, and by October 2015 its monthly unique visitors had nearly doubled from the year before, the Wall Street Journal reported.

One can expect Vanity Fair to go with a similar setup to The New Yorker, as both are Conde Nast publications. Vanity Fair has had recent success with its tech blog, The Hive—that’s likely a section that wouldn’t go behind the wall.

Back in 2010, Conde Nast’s then-VP of business development said at a conference, “Walling off our content and saying ‘you can’t have it,’ I don’t think that’s the right strategy.” But that was seven years ago, and that executive is no longer at Conde Nast.

In his now-famous tweet about Vanity Fair, Trump added that Graydon Carter is “no talent” and “will be out!” But if the paywall works well, media industry pundits may end up declaring the opposite.

Written by Daniel Roberts, 12 April, 2017, published on Read the full article here

Keep in touch
Get our free weekly retail
newsstand report
Enter your email below for our free weekly retail newsstand report, InterMedia updates and relevant industry news. You
can easily unsubscribe at any time. Click here for our privacy policy.
Get in touch

Unit 6 The Enterprise Centre
Kelvin Lane, Crawley,
RH10 9PE

Registered in England & Wales: InterMedia Brand
Marketing Limited. 07256268. Registered Office: North
Quay House, Sutton Harbour, Plymouth. PL4 0RA
Subscribe today
Enter your email below to subscribe
for InterMedia free weekly newsstand
reports, updates and industry news.
You can easily unsubscribe at any time using the link at the
bottom of any of our emails, or by emailing us. Click here
to read our full privacy policy.
Part of the InterGo Group
The InterGo group work together
seamlessly to connect and deliver
brands to consumers.
© 2021 InterMedia Brand Marketing Limited. All rights
reserved. InterMedia is a trademark of InterMedia Brand
Marketing Limited. All content, trademarks, artwork and
associated imagery are trademarks and/or copyright
material of their owners.
We love cookies
This website uses cookies based on your browsing activity. By continuing
to use this website you consent to our Privacy Policy and Cookies Policy.